From 83af9519487ae182a587d4cac218fc4cf5fa16f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:04:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix SetupOpFlag value to be proper format

For some reason the second flags is "2<<0", but really flags should
be 1<<N, and in this case 1<<1. Both happen to be the same value, so its
not like this matter deeply, but lets fix it if we do later changes.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
---
 bubblewrap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/bubblewrap.c b/bubblewrap.c
index 9b78a9a..c414bb0 100644
--- a/bubblewrap.c
+++ b/bubblewrap.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ typedef enum {
 
 typedef enum {
   NO_CREATE_DEST = (1 << 0),
-  ALLOW_NOTEXIST = (2 << 0),
+  ALLOW_NOTEXIST = (1 << 1),
 } SetupOpFlag;
 
 typedef struct _SetupOp SetupOp;