From 8634ad929103eb3e348b6bf1715bcf36537cd437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "W. Trevor King" Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:36:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] spec: Add "NOT RECOMMENDED" to RFC 2119 keywords Catching up with erratum 499 [1]. [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2119&eid=499 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King --- spec.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/spec.md b/spec.md index efb8e74..3324ead 100644 --- a/spec.md +++ b/spec.md @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Platforms defined by this specification are: # Notational Conventions -The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119][rfc2119]. +The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119][rfc2119]. The key words "unspecified", "undefined", and "implementation-defined" are to be interpreted as described in the [rationale for the C99 standard][c99-unspecified].