The release process hopes to encourage early, consistent consensus-building during project development.
The mechanisms used are regular community communication on the mailing list about progress, scheduled meetings for issue resolution and release triage, and regularly paced and communicated releases.
Releases are proposed and adopted or rejected using the usual [project governance](GOVERNANCE.md) rules and procedures.
An anti-pattern that we want to avoid is heavy development or discussions "late cycle" around major releases.
We want to build a community that is involved and communicates consistently through all releases instead of relying on "silent periods" as a judge of stability.
## Parallel releases
A single project MAY consider several motions to release in parallel.
However each motion to release after the initial 0.1.0 MUST be based on a previous release that has already landed.
To avoid unfortunate side effects (onerous backwards compatibility requirements or Member resignations), the following additional procedures apply to specification releases:
Every OCI specification project SHOULD hold meetings that involve maintainers reviewing pull requests, debating outstanding issues, and planning releases.
This meeting MUST be advertised on the project README and MAY happen on a phone call, video conference, or on IRC.
The release plans, corresponding milestones and estimated due dates MUST be published on GitHub (e.g. <https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/milestones>).
GitHub milestones and issues are only used for community organization and all releases MUST follow the [project governance](GOVERNANCE.md) rules and procedures.
### Timelines
Specifications have a variety of different timelines in their lifecycle.
This means a major release like a v1.0.0 or v2.0.0 release will take 1 month at minimum: one week for rc1, one week for rc2, one week for rc3, and one week for the major release itself.
Maintainers SHOULD strive to make zero breaking changes during this cycle of release candidates and SHOULD restart the three-candidate count when a breaking change is introduced.
For example if a breaking change is introduced in v1.0.0-rc2 then the series would end with v1.0.0-rc4 and v1.0.0.
- [ ] count the PRs since last release (that this version is tracking, in the cases of multiple branching), like `git log --pretty=oneline --no-merges --decorate $priorTag..$versionBumpCommit | grep \(pr\/ | wc -l`
- [ ] get the date for a week from now, like `TZ=UTC date --date='next week'`
- [ ] OPTIONAL find a cute animal gif to attach to the email, and subsequently the release description
- [ ] subject line like `[distribution-spec VOTE] tag $versionBumpCommit as $version (closes $dateWeekFromNowUTC)`
There have been $numPRs PRs merged since $priorTag release (https://github.com/opencontainers/distribution-spec/compare/$priorTag...$versionBumpCommit).